GQ-43
This fact sheet summarizes the composition data compiled for corn samples collected in Indiana during the 1999 harvest. District results are presented and composition data from the 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 crop years are compared.
Whole ear corn samples were taken directly from the field as
part of a multi-year survey conducted by the Purdue University
Botany and Plant Pathology Department. The Indiana Agricultural
Statistics Service in West Lafayette conducted the sampling. Samples
were analyzed for fungal damage, and mycotoxin levels were quantified.
Each ear corn sample consisted of 5-10 ears, which were placed
in cotton bags. After the disease analysis, each bag of ears was
dried with forced air and subsequently shelled using a stationary
sheller. After shelling, the whole kernels were analyzed for moisture,
protein, oil, starch, and density using a near-infrared transmittance
(NIRT) whole grain analyzer (Infratech 1229) at the Purdue University
Grain Quality Laboratory in the Department of Agricultural and
Biological Engineering. All results are reported on a 15% moisture
content basis (wet).
A total of 299 samples were available for composition analysis
from all nine crop-reporting districts. The number of samples
from each crop-reporting district was roughly proportional to
the corn acreage although the East Central and Southeast districts
were slightly over-represented this year (Table 1). In comparison
to the previous year, the acres per sample increased by approximately
850 acres per sample while production per sample decreased again
this year by 18,000 bushels per sample from the 1998 all time
low due to decreased production statewide in 1999.
The results in Table 2 only give an indication of the composition
values of corn across Indiana. Conditions during the growing season,
hybrid selection, and soil fertility significantly affect intrinsic
values such as protein, oil, starch, and density. Producers need
to have their own samples analyzed to get more precise values.
The overall state protein average increased 1.3 percentage
points to 7.8% (Table 2, Figure 1) from the 1998 average. This
value is very close to the state averages for the years 1995-1997.
The spread between the minimum and maximum protein contents increased
to 10.5 points, an increase of more than 1.5 times compared to
the 1998 spread, which was 6.3 points. The 1999 spread is the
largest to date, showing more variability in the samples received
since 1997, which was 7.4 points and spreads of 5.4 and 4.0 for
1996 and 1995 respectively.
Generally, protein content is negatively correlated to starch
content, however, the measured starch content provided in the
following tables may not equal the extractable starch content
available to processors. While the protein average increased in
1999, the starch content decreased 1.3 percentage points to 62.8%
(Table 2, Figure 2). Starch ranges increased for the fourth straight
year to 10.7 points, up from 10.0 points in 1998 and 9.6, 6.2,
and 4.9 points for 1997, 1996, and 1995 respectively. Thus, the
1999 corn crop was more variable in its major constituents than
in previous years. This increased variability may reflect an increase
in the types of corn grown for niche markets by Indiana farmers.
The average oil content increased 0.1 percentage points to 3.3%.
However, average oil contents have essentially remained unchanged
for the past five years even though four high oil corn samples
were included in the 1999 survey. Density is an indication of
kernel hardness. There was an increase of 0.023 g/ml to 1.322
g/ml in average density when compared to the 1998 data.
The results in Table 2 only give an indication of the composition
values of corn across Indiana. Conditions during the growing season,
hybrid selection, and soil fertility significantly affect intrinsic
values such as protein, oil, starch, and density. Producers need
to have their own samples analyzed to get more precise values.
A statistical analysis was performed on the data collected
from the last four years using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS)
to uncover differences between years and between districts within
a year. All tests used an alpha of 0.05. District summary values
for 1996, 1997, and 1998 can be found in Grain Quality Fact Sheets
32, 37, and 40, respectively. The results of the analysis can
be found in Tables 3 and 4. In Table 3, for each compositional
component the years with the same letter are statistically similar,
while in Table 4, the districts with the same letter are similar
within the year.
Yearly trends are apparent in the analysis of the data, showing
that 1998 was the only year in which the statewide protein content
average was statistically different than the other years (Table
3). In 1996, the NE and SE districts were similarly low in protein
compared to all other districts (Table 4). In 1997 and 1999, all
districts were statistically similar in protein, while in 1998
the SC district was higher in protein compared to all other districts.
The SW and WC districts had consistently higher protein averages.
In the past three out of four years, they have been in the top
three districts. The SW district had the third highest average
in 1996 (7.9%), the highest in 1997 (8.2%), and the second highest
in 1998 (6.9%). However, in 1999, it had the lowest protein average
of the state at 7.1%. The WC district had the highest average
in 1996 (8.2%), the second highest in 1997 (8.2%), and the third
highest in 1998 (6.7%). In 1999, the WC district slipped to sixth
place. The NE district had the lowest average at 6.6% in 1996,
while the EC district had the lowest averages for 1997 and 1998
with 6.9 and 6.0%, respectively. The SE district had the second
lowest averages in all three years with 6.6, 7.4, and 6.0% protein
respectively. However, in 1999 the SE district had a 8.2% protein
average, second highest in the state.
Oil contents were fairly consistent across the last four years
with only 1998 being significantly different (Table 3). In 1996
and 1998, all districts were similar in oil, while in 1997 the
SC district was statistically higher in oil compared to all other
districts (Table 4). In 1999, the NW district was significantly
higher while the SW district was lower compared to all of the
other districts. The SE district had the highest oil content average
at 3.4% in 1996, but had the lowest average in 1997 (3.1%) and
was tied for the lowest in 1999 with a 3.3 average. The SC district
had the highest averages in both 1997 and 1998, 4.3% and 3.4%
respectively. The NC district had the second highest average in
1996 with 3.4%, while the WC district was second for both 1997
and 1998 and ranked fourth in 1999 with averages of 3.5, 3.4,and
3.3% respectively. The NW district had the highest average in
1999, averaging 3.6%. The NE district had the lowest average in
1996 with 3.1% while the SW district had the lowest in 1998 and
1999 with 2.9% and 3.1% average respectively.
Starch content has been statistically different in each of the
last four years, with 1998 having the highest average followed
by 1999, 1997, and 1996 respectively (Table 3). In 1996, the NC
and WC districts were statistically lower in starch than all other
districts, while the NE and SE districts were statistically higher
than all other districts (Table 4). In 1997 and 1999, there was
no significant difference among districts in starch content, while
in 1998, the SC district was significantly lower compared to all
other districts. The SE district was in the top three districts
in overall starch content average three out of four years. In
1996, the NE district had the highest average with 62.2%, followed
by the SE and SC districts (61.6%, and 61.4% respectively). EC
district had the highest average in 1997, with SE district second
(62.4%) and the NE district third with a 62.1% average. The SE
district had the highest average of 64.5% in 1998, while the EC
and C districts were second and third respectively (64.4% and
64.3%). The SW district had the highest average at 63.7% in 1999,
while the WC and C districts were second highest with a 62.9%
average. The WC district had one of the two lowest averages in
three out of four years of the survey. The WC district had the
lowest average in 1996 (60.9%), and second lowest in 1997 and
1998 with a 61.5% and 63.6% average, respectively. The C district
had the third lowest average in 1996 and 1997 with 61.1% and 61.9%,
respectively. The NC district had the lowest average at 62.2%
in 1999, followed by the EC and SE districts, which averaged 62.3%.
Two of the years, 1997 and 1998, were statistically similar with
regards to density, while 1999 had the highest average and 1996
had the lowest (Table 3). In 1996 and 1997, all districts were
similar in density values, while in 1998 the SW district was significantly
higher and the WC, EC, and SE districts were lower compared to
all other districts (Table 4). The NC district was significantly
higher in density while the NW and SC districts had significantly
lower values in 1999. The SW district was in the top three districts
in three out of four years, being third in 1996 (1.276 g/ml),
second in 1997 (1.308 g/ml) and had the highest average in 1998
(1.315 g/ml). The NC district had the third highest average in
1997, the second highest average in 1998 and the highest average
in 1999 (1.306, 1.305, and 1.336 g/ml respectively). The SE district
was in the bottom three each of the four years. It had the lowest
average in 1996 and 1998 with averages of 1.253 and 1.289 g/ml
respectively. In 1997, the SE district had the second lowest average
with 1.286 g/ml and in 1999 had the third lowest average (1.316
g/ml).
District | Harvested Acres (1000's) |
Acres per Samples |
Yield (Bu/ac) | Production (1000 Bu) |
Production (1000 Bu) per Sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NW | 910 | 22,195 | 136 | 123,767 | 3,019 |
NC | 765 | 20,132 | 117 | 89,510 | 2,356 |
NE | 565 | 29,737 | 116 | 65,544 | 3,450 |
WC | 715 | 17,439 | 132 | 94,385 | 2,302 |
C | 1,250 | 18,657 | 142 | 177,509 | 2,649 |
EC | 450 | 14,516 | 138 | 62,103 | 2,003 |
SW | 730 | 17,381 | 129 | 94,175 | 2,242 |
SC | 185 | 23,125 | 109 | 20,166 | 2,521 |
SE | 180 | 15,000 | 113 | 20,341 | 1,695 |
State | 5,750 | 19,231 | 130 | 747,500 | 2,500 |
1998 | 5,500 | 18,377 | 134 | 760,350 | 2,518 |
1997 | 5,850 | 36,792 | 123 | 719,550 | 4,525 |
1996 | 5,600 | 26,794 | 123 | 670,350 | 3,207 |
1995 | 5,400 | 35,762 | 113 | 598,900 | 3,966 |
Purdue University's Grain Quality Laboratory continues to offer
composition analysis for whole corn, soybeans, and soybean meal.
This service is offered at no chargeto Indiana
producers, elevators, and processors thanks to a Value-Added Grant
from the Office of Indiana's Commissioner of Agriculture and a
grant from the Mary S. Rice Farm Estate. 450 g (about 1 lb.) may
be sent to
For further information, call (765) 494-2285, or send e-mail to
grainlab@ecn.purdue.edu,
or visit us on the World Wide Web at http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~grainlab,
where data from a number of county test plots are summarized.
Grain Quality Fact Sheets can be accessed
on-line through the World Wide Web at: http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/grain.htm (select) Grain Quality or http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~grainlab (select) On-Line Extension Publications (select) Grain Quality Fact Sheets Almanac: send e-mail to: almanac@ecn.purdue.edu message: send grain guide or send grain catalog or send grain factsheet #41 (for example) or send acsonline GQ-41 |